Even the independent magistrates joined in, although they disapproved of the method of protest, which they criticised as unnecessarily showy.
But as regards the seriousness of the protest, the judges' solidarity was almost total. Judges have been abused and threatened by Berlusconi for years. He has variously described them as metastasis , mentally unstable, execution squads, red gowns and idlers.
Finally, Italian judges wanted to express their dissent. They might not have all agreed on the strategy adopted to manifest their objections, but were united about the contents of the protest. What is happening in Italy?
In short, the executive power is using its legislative power to obstruct the power of the judiciary. The premier's judicial problems weigh heavily on the country; he is at the heart of various investigations which his government and its allies regularly define as "political persecutions", endorsing the ridiculous theory that Berlusconi is the victim of politically influenced judges.
I was like WHAT!?! Saly rated it liked it Dec 13, Sep 01, Aruna rated it liked it. A premier cannot be above the law, nor can he be below it. But as regards the seriousness of the protest, the judges' solidarity was almost total. Taylor's law out of order. We expect to be married and content
And as Marco Travaglio at Fatto Quotidiano opportunely reminded readers, "in other democracies, if a magistrate puts a politician on trial, the politician resigns. In Italy it's either the trial itself or the judge that disappears".
Since Berlusconi has just visited Israel, Travaglio recalled the farewell speech Olmert, the former Israeli prime minister, had made to the Knesset in August Sadly, Italian politicians rarely ask themselves if they are an embarrassment to their country. I'm certain that Berlusconi never does.
The idea that power goes hand in hand with responsibility is typical of Protestant nations. Newest Questions Post a Question Search All Questions Please cite all facts with citation links or references from authoritative sources. Editors continuously recheck submissions and claims.
What is the origin of the phrase "A law unto himself", and did it originally have the meaning popularly associated with it? TabbyTom Answer has 6 votes. TabbyTom Moderator 17 year member replies Answer has 6 votes.
Currently voted the best answer. Vote for this answer.
Nowadays, if we say that a person is a law unto himself, we generally mean that he makes his own rules and is not subject to the same rules and conventions as the rest of us. In the King James version, verses 10 to 15 of chapter 2 read: But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile: For there is no respect of persons with God. For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without law: For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: